Compare the details, without a score.

Choose two profiles to compare the company, documented platforms and the questions still worth checking.

Comparing CMC Markets and IG. Sources checked 9 November 2026.

Two document records, read side by side. No ranking.
Research fieldCMC MarketsIG
Source-named GB CFD entityCMC Markets UK plcIG Markets Ltd
Provider-stated FCA reference173730195355
Documented platform optionsBroker web / mobile, MetaTrader 4, TradingViewBroker web / mobile, MetaTrader 4, TradingView, ProRealTime
Research questionSeparate the proprietary platform from the MetaTrader account.Distinguish the CFD entity from other IG account types.
Important qualificationA platform’s product library, order types and account pricing can differ. The presence of an instrument on one CMC platform does not establish that it is available on another.An investment account, spread betting account and CFD account are different products. A platform feature or fee quoted for one should not be carried over to another.
ProfileRead CMC Markets research ↗Read IG research ↗

Why there is no winner

A documented platform list is a factual field, not a quality score. More interfaces do not establish better execution, lower total cost or a more suitable product. A firm reference number identifies a record to check; it does not measure trading risk.

Profiles are based on the relevant broker’s public documents. We have not opened accounts or tested customer service, funding, withdrawals or execution. Read the evidence boundaries before drawing a conclusion.

Make the next comparison specific

Once the entity is confirmed, record the exact account type, product and platform. Then collect the fee unit, charge currency, holding-cost schedule and contract specification for a consistent example.

Numbers from different jurisdictions or measurement periods may not be comparable. The cost ledger uses values you enter and makes the arithmetic visible; it does not pull live broker prices.

Model spread and commission costs ↗