Pepperstone

Compare platform and account pricing as a pair.

Public-document research / Checked 9 November 2026

Source-named company
Pepperstone Limited
Provider-stated FCA reference
684312
Research emphasis
Third-party platforms

Pepperstone’s Great Britain offering spans its own interfaces and several third-party platforms. That makes the relationship between account pricing and platform eligibility a central research question.

What the primary source says

The Great Britain site identifies Pepperstone Limited, FCA reference 684312. Its platform page lists MT4, MT5, TradingView and cTrader alongside Pepperstone’s own platform and app.

Platform options recorded in this edition:

  • Broker web / mobile
  • MetaTrader 4
  • MetaTrader 5
  • TradingView
  • cTrader

Read Pepperstone’s platform documentation (opens in a new tab) ↗

The important comparison

Do not assume that a commission figure, account type or feature shown for one platform automatically applies to another. Read the account-specific schedule, including how one side of a trade is defined.

Use the legal agreement and the schedule attached to the intended account. A group-wide feature list cannot confirm eligibility for a resident, product or classification. We have not opened a demo or live account, measured execution or tested withdrawals.

Questions to take to the documents

  1. Which account types can use your chosen platform?
  2. Is the commission quoted per side or for a round trip?
  3. Is the charge expressed per lot or per currency notional?
  4. Are platform add-ons subject to separate eligibility or fees?

Price and protection have different evidence

This profile does not publish minimum spreads, a leverage offer or a loss percentage. These are changing, scoped figures and would need the relevant instrument, account and observation period. You can model a linear spread-and-commission example in the cost calculator, using values you have independently obtained.

For identity, use the FCA’s official Firm Checker (opens in a new tab) ↗. Match company, permission and contact details rather than relying on the reference number alone. Regulation does not remove trading losses or establish suitability.

Our evidence boundary

The entry is document-based information, not a recommendation or a test verdict. Brokers are listed alphabetically throughout the directory and no payment determines their position. The source check date records this edition’s research; it does not imply continuous monitoring. See how profiles are prepared for the selection and update process.

Sources & scope

Primary documents checked 9 November 2026. Pages and account terms can change. Broker statements are attributed to the provider, not a fresh regulatory certification by PipBriefing.